by
Ines Gallic
B+B
In
many tongues a ubiquitous Mr Plod lurks round every crook &
granny, making a blasted nuisance of itself. If English was/were your
first language, chances are you'd've dissected a little frog at
school, and remember with fond sighs how être with its
je not suis joking, elle est tête-à-tête
avec un punter lorsque vous - mes amis - êtes
un sac tres fragrant de plonquers, etc.. (En standard
Inglish the protagonists are, of course, Ah ain't,
she his, youse are –
with differences too familiar for words.) Now the old Spanish lingua
- a little forked number if ever there was - has two be's
for
the price of one:
ser & estar – the trick of
learning which is which; while olmak (your
Toikish to be)
somewhere on its sojourn from the steps of Mangoolia to the shores
of Lake Wozname has picked up the trick of disappearing up its own
frigging Jarvis. It never ceases to piss one off how the world's
various to be's
give rule-breaking such a lousy character ref..
This
work, however, which advertises itself as a practical piece of kit
for incoming forgers & the like, sets aside philosophy and kicks
off by giving a quick rundown on just how the old been
differs from just about every other doing word with its root on the
block.
Your
English be just don't got an auxiliary, see. Not
even a half-frozen jet-lag, bailing out of his wheel cowling, hits
the old tarmac with a, If you please, Mr Nice Friendly Aeroport
Chappie, be so good as to inform me, in which state do I be?
Such
talk will only get thee, new arrival, consigned to the very lowest
grade of Reception Centre, with scanty access to pretty young social
workers and vicars in loose cassocks. No, the mistake you hopeful
dodger have made is deploying yr do/does
where it hain't wanted. Act dung & note à la Benny, Matey, the
English grammar scuffers are dub hounds at spotting poorly schooled
ex-colonials with de slexic auxiliaries.
But
(that useful but overused conjunctive term), doobie-doobie careful
when conversing with natives on arrival. First impressions last
longer than a miser's Polo mint. To speak pukka English, you have to
be able to work your tongue through the eye of a camel-hair needle,
which doubtless, not even the poor old queen has ever succeeded at.
And I aren't joking now, am I? Woe betide me if I was/were, hung,
drawn & quartered like the rest who've dared criticise the way
the dear navvies of these terribly dear islands speak. Don't be a
dumb bum-plug with thine hosts, it's better to err & splutter on
the side of deliberate stupidity than to pull the silver spoon from
the baby's gob.
Ah-hem,
generally, as stated above, doing our best to avoid philosophical
digressions... the verb to be is not all slugs &
marrows. As any has-been will tell you, there's a helluva lot to get
away with using only am/is/are, plus the odd was/were,
tacking a coupla discrete -ings & -ens,
deploying the full set of modals & giving it a sharp pat or two
on its bare infinitive. A former citizen of Geneva made a dozen
extempore appearances on the middle-brow radio talk show, Half A
Mo, without using a single verb beside be.
He was later done for verbals and spent six months in Dungeonness
writing his “Confessions of a Swiss Cheese” with just the one
doing word throughout. Magnificent economy. Here's a random excerpt,
reproduced with the kind permission of Schikser & Goy,
“Who
on earth is in their right mind over this? And wherever would one be
without that? Those of us who can't be Shaw, for example, or indeed
any personal adjective, may be certain that there are few - if any –
as time is short and, as it were, often, the expenditure of being is
less nowadays than it has ever been. And I, furthermore, as I am, was
and ever shall be besides myself with uncertainty over this. Oh! how
all other possibilities being baseless, or as they may be, dubious of
purpose, I would rather be utterly lost for words than even a trifle
obtuse etc..”
Of
course, pure philosophy of this type is something we have vowed to
shun for the present. And we will continue to assert this, in spite
of our little transgressions...
Listening
Test #1
Now
hear this.
And
this.
Your
first hearing can be a tremendous trauma for the un-deaf, so be
cautioned, “You do have the right to remain silent.”
Flipping
warrant officers are a pain in the speaking trumpet, like friendly
taxi drivers and native hairdressers, the nosey so-and-so's. Should
be included in a list of banned tortures. Don't be fooled by their
chumminess, they are as sly as all comers. The trick is to say
nothing, keep your eyes propped open with cocktail sticks, your ears
sown back, and never be fooled into opening your greedy cake-hole.
Even asking to go to the little boy's room can be misinterpreted. And
don't say you want a lawyer. They'll go, “Wise move, that!”
report you'd done a load in your kex and therefore must be guilty.
THIS IS NOT THE TIME TO PRACTICE YOUR RELATIVE CLAUSE AND INTONATION
SKILLS. Box clever and act dumb. It will help if you know the Masonic
hand signals for asylum seeker.
Be
ready for all manner of provocations. They'll impute the lifestyle of
your dear mama, claim your bro's a tailor of suicide vests, or that
your sis has swapped sides and is working in the canteen at GCHQ.
Sonic attack should be resisted with nothing more than a few puzzled
looks and the occasional raised eyebrow.
2B/-2B
The
meaning of be is all-purpose and may be employed
however, wherever, whenever & by whomsoever the fancy takes it.
Note, therefore, the following statements: I am a right
stickler. Botany and insanity are frequent bedfellows.
Don't be silly, Billy, crap is brown &
smelly. That post office isn't open any more. Hain't Arriet's andwriting arf-arted? I'm not all ears on
Sundays. Our geese aren't all that hungry. And that so-called curry, btw, was pricey for a yellow chunder. His sandals were
cheap plastic jobs made in France. The captain wasn't
exactly onboard at the time. Weren't the Williamses
mean with the sauce? Have you been here
all along, you snivelling little twerp? What has that
blasted cat been up to? If I'd been in
your shoes, I'd've been furious. He should be
on by now. It's impossible, she can't be
pregnant again! For gawdsake, now you're just being
awkward.
Also
of note is the preponderance of naming and descriptive terms, the
spatial and temporal location of things and states; the admixing of
frequency & intensity adverbs; plus the tailgating of occasional
phrasal particles.
What
be don't mean, though, is harder to pinpoint as it's a
bleeding auxiliary and has got itself mixed up with all kinds of
cheesey gerunds and toffee-nosed participles - many of which are
clearly action nouns and adjectives - but many more are just crying
out to be pinned to the inside of your locker. I mean, what does
“There's a gone chick!” mean at the foot of our
stairs? Or, for that matter, “He's smoking hot!”
This
kind of distortion don't just start and end with the hip talk of
beatniks. Once Post-Modernism takes hold, all kinds of dodgy beings
muscle in on the scene. But there's nothing new under the sun. You
can thank that prince of wimps Omelet for bringing existence into
question with his succinct turn of the infinitive. Nope, prefixing
-moan, -wail, -smirch and -off in petulant whines, the Danish wannabe
succeeds in nothing but his own belittlement. To
be or not to be, chummy, make yr bloody mind
up - before we're all becalmed on your
celebrity a-sides, besides & - don't wait for it –
seasides (eg let Bognor be buggered).
Writing
Test #1
Never
sign a statement, just claim you've momentarily forgot your silly
name. Try to organise at least some of the words into sentences. If
you are right handed, it goes without saying, write with your left
foot. Use punctuation, apostrophes, inkblots and doodles to enhance
your gist. Above all, appear to write like an over-educated
three-year old with attitude. If you can't think of a word, draw its
picture using abstract art techniques where necessary. But don't try
to be Picasso, a cross between Raphael's early Vatican work and a
David Shrigley will do nicely.
Don't
be hog-tied by the intro/main-body/conclusion stereotype. Include a
whole paragraph of topic sentences if the fancy takes you.
chapter two: "to
have and have got"
Hemingway
had his. Or put it another way, he almost did. Is it simply more U to stutter, I have a talent, than to say I've got
it!? If the reverse is true, do you go, I haven't/don't
have/haven't got/hain't got - or
even - don't gotta time for one? And if you're really
in need, do you have/have
you got or simply have you any idea what
we're on about here?
I
mean, aren't alternatives supposed to be.... alternative? Wouldn't
you expect these various options to offer some concrete nuances? I
mean, do you get it? (And, whatever you
do, don't get gotten on
me.)
The
fact is, the verb to have preserves some of the old
school features of to be in its casebook. It can be
used with or without the auxiliary do/does,
or it can be deployed as an auxiliary with another verb entirely -
get - to mean pretty much the same thing: possession.
Now,
as any fool will tell you, ninety percent of the law is possession,
possession & possession. That's roughly thirty percent each to
stolen goods, illegal substances and the tools of the trade (that's
any firearms, jelly, jammies, and/or the odd bot - for all you happy
cyber crims out there caught with your red hooks on the boodle).
Sir
Ronnie, the late left-footed train rotter, having served most of his
sentence on the beach at Copper Cabana, presented himself to the crew
of HMS Danae by asking if they ad enny Red Barrel aboard (there's
taste for ya)...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Readers' comments are welcome!